|
. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Abstract
L.B. van der Meer The recently regenerated, vexed question of Etruscan origins should be related to the fact that the Etruscan, Raetic and Lemnian languages have strong resemblances. According to M. Pallottino the languages originally belonged to a Mediterranean, non-Indo-European language dating back to the time of the Eneolithic Rinaldone-culture, which is partially of East-European origin. Orientalists suppose that Tyrsenians (Etruscans) emigrated from (North) Western Asia Minor, or the North Aegean area, to Italy around the turn of the 12th century BC. C. de Simone (1996) reasons that Etruscans from southern Etruria settled on Lemnos before or around 700 BC. However, the differences between Etruscan, Raetic and Lemnian show that these languages evolved during some time on their own spot. The question is: did they have a common ancestor, and if so, where and when? What are the implications for the question of the origins? Can archaeologists solve the problem? Which sources are most reliable: linguistic, archaeological or philological-historical evidence? The linguistic evidence is strongly in favour of the orientalist theory. Article in volume 79, 2004, pages 51-57 Buy and download the article as PDF file
The other articles in volume 79, 2004: Conrad M. Stibbe R. de Zwarte Julie van Kerckhove Christoph Ohlig Boaz Zissu and Amir Ganor Ans Braakenburg-van Breukelen Mark Hirst and Gina Salapata Olivier Hekster Richard de Kind D.C. Steures J.M. Hemelrijk |
|