|
. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
For information |
Abstract Noor van Krimpen-Winckel This article presents an analysis of the building history and a reconstruction of the design of two Pompeian atrium houses with a longitudinal peristyle-garden, the House of Philippus (VI 13, 2) and the House of M. Terentius Eudoxus (VI 13, 6).1 The results of the analyses will be used to search for new insights in the social context of these houses at the time when they were constructed and during their history of occupation and use. The social history of Pompeii and the role of the house therein is a popular and fruitful research topic of many studies that are concerned with the ancient city of Pompeii. The fact that the actual layout of a house, the design by an architect, also carries in it many social signs that are not immediately visible, but can be discerned by a metrological analysis, will be demonstrated by the following study. Article in volume 81, 2006, pages 135-168 Buy and download the article as PDF file
The other articles in volume 81, 2006 G.C. Duermeijer F. González de Canales, L. Serrano & J. Llompart Albert J. Nijboer & J. van der Plicht Roald F. Docter, Fethi Chelbi, Boutheina Maraoui Telmini, Babette Bechtold, Hamden Ben Romdhane, Vanessa Declercq, Tijs De Schacht, Eline Deweirdt, Alain De Wulf, Lamia Fersi, Suzanne Frey-Kupper, Soumaya Garsallah, Ineke Joosten, Hans Koens, Jalel Mabrouk, Taoufik Redisssi, Sihem Roudesli Chebbi, Karen Ryckbosch, Karin Schmidt, Birgit Taverniers, Julie Van Kerckhove, Lieven Verdonck Douwe G. Yntema Leonard V. Rutgers, Klaas van der Borg, Arie F.M. de Jong & Arnold Provoost Wim Hottentot & Sophia M.E. van Lith Richard Miles |
|